?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

The more I think about it...

...the more angry I get. This whole TSA thing with the no liquids, no makeup, take off your shoes, blah, blah, blah.

I give you my Rights. The "Miranda Rights." Amendments IV and V: (copied direct from The Dept. of State's site)

Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

If these new "regulations" don't constitute "unreasonable searches and seizures" of people's "effects," I don't know what is. If it's a reasonable seizure, then my Fresca and Cover Girl must be thought to be explosives, and therefore not simply put in a bin with hundreds of other people's explosives. If the power of a Venti Mocha is enough to bring down a plane, a 50 gallon trash bin full of like materials would be enough to destroy the entire security check-in. Also, if it's a reasonable seizure, and everyone's carry-on liquids are thought to be actual explosives, then why is not everyone being arrested for attempted terrorist conspiracy?

Some may say, "but Miranda, these new regulations are in place to ensure the safety of all who travel the unfriendly skies. Isn't giving up your coffee worth it? It's just a thing, after all." To them, I answer: No. To take such a thing from me is to say that I have done something wrong or will, at the very least, be able to do something terribly wrong with it. If I have an explosive in my possession, and I am attempting to board an airplane, then arrest me and confiscate said explosive. Give me due process, because I shall "not be deprived of ... liberty, or property" without it. I understand the need for vigilance, but this has gone much too far. When was the last time someone was robbed with nailclippers? When was the last time someone robbed a bank with coffee? Save for Marty McFly, when was the last time anyone struck fear into the heart of anyone with a portable music player?

Now, I don't fly very often. I can count the number of airline flights I've taken on my two hands. The last time I flew was in Oct and Nov 2001, just weeks after the events of 11 Sept. No one confiscated CDs, which could be broken and used as a weapon. No one took away headphones, which could be used to strangle someone. No one had their coffee taken away. I still can't understand why anyone would. What has happened to this country that we are so terrified that we won't allow mothers to bring jars of baby food on board an airplane?

I know that heart disease and cancer combined are the cause of about half of all the deaths in the US. Why then are not fried foods and cigarettes illegal? Why is exercise not mandatory? It's been shown that behaviour influences our risk of death. Tobacco use and diet/activity patterns are the two greatest underlying causes (almost 70%). These are things we can influence, but still we do not. For the most part, we have the freedom to choose what we do with and to put into our bodies. When it comes to flying, it seems to take a turn because of the possible effect on other people. Many places throughout the country have banned smoking in public places for the sake of those who don't want secondhand smoke. Still, automobile accidents count for over 40% of all accidental deaths, and we build roads faster than ever.

I'm not sure what to think. We are an illogical species in many respects. I know that I have wondered many, many times since these infringements on our freedoms began, "Where is the ACLU, defender of freedom?" So, I have taken the time to look at their website and am pleasantly suprised to see that they were victorious in ACLU v. NSA to have the court order an immediate stop to the NSA's illegal wiretapping program on the 17 of this month. I sometimes forget that legal action sometimes takes a great deal of time, and with the rate of our freedoms' abridgement ever increasing, the ACLU is hard-taxed to keep up. It sometimes takes an attack to realise we should be ready to defend ourselves. The attacks are now on our liberties by our own government, much of which, it seems has forgotten what it means to be American.

I've just joined the ACLU with a donation.

Here is their entreaty for others to join:
Over the last four years, we have seen an unrelenting assault on our civil liberties and the very values that define our democracy. Even as his presidency falters, George Bush and his administration have not backed down from their reactionary agenda. But the American people are making their voices heard as more and more people question the direction our country is taking. Now is the time to redouble our efforts to protect rights like freedom of speech, religious liberty, due process and the right to privacy.

The ACLU is standing strong in defense of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. To find out how you can get involved go to:
http://www.aclu.org

Join the ACLU Today! Visit http://www.aclu.org/join


I know some of my friends are already members, and I encourage those who are not to join. This post is probably the most political I've ever been on LJ, and it must be close to the longest entry, if not that. It really does take a lot to get me riled.

*mortality stats from http://www.benbest.com/lifeext/causes.html, 2002

Comments

( 4 comments — Leave a comment )
ladypentacles
Aug. 20th, 2006 04:53 pm (UTC)
Posts like this scare me just a little bit, because I don't want the NSA to read it and get ideas. I don't doubt that a time will come, probably in the near future when the government does try to regulate what we do with our bodies. If they can refuse marriage to loving, committed couples and take away potentially dangerous baby food, who's to say that regulating how much ice cream you can purchase or some other such nonsense?

I like your suggestion re: the ACLU and I, for one, am going to look into joining.
mandydax
Aug. 20th, 2006 08:12 pm (UTC)
I didn't even put in there people with implants or colostomy bags and such. If someone really wants to get a dangerous liquid on board, the drug mules have figured out dozens of ways to do it.

Thanks for taking the time to read it all. I don't usually go off like that, but my tolerance for this crap that the government is putting our rights thru is worn thru. I'm really happy to see that judges seem to have integrity. It's probably because most of them aren't in voted positions.
ladypentacles
Aug. 21st, 2006 12:20 am (UTC)
I got really mad earlier thinking about freedom of religion. I practice a nature-based, loving religion. It's premises are kindness towards oneself and others, welcoming and acceptance, and freedom of expression and sexuality.

Yet, I just know that the word "witch" conjures these images of evil, harmful, sinful women in people's minds. I was imagining having a conversation about sex with a conservative Christian, someone who truly views sex, for pleasure, as sinful, and realized that in some minds, I am going to hell in handbasket for so many reasons!

Never mind that I believe neither in hell nor sin. Never mind that I feel that I practice the philosophy of Jesus more wholly than many people I can think of. Never mind that I work for social justice and peace.

And I realized that this country is founded, in many ways, upon the dominant (Christian) socio-religious paradigm. Religion influences the law (like the pro-marriage bullshit), it influences the government, it influences education, and it influences my rights as a citizen and woman and witch.

What the fuck right to conservative Christians (and other fundies) have to bring their religion into my home and my life? I don't believe their bullshit, yet I have to live my life in accordance with those values to live in this country? That seems so completely counter to what I think the constitution is about....it's just left over puritanical influences that should have been wiped out by folks like Jefferson.

Sometimes I wonder how my life would be different if I hadn't been raised in this culture, in this dominant social paradigm. Would I have multiple sexual partners? Would I still be female? Would I own a home? Would I feel and behave and believe in less fucked up ways?

Totally off the subject...but have you ever read The Fifth Sacred Thing by Starhawk? If not, you must.....
mandydax
Aug. 21st, 2006 02:32 am (UTC)
I'm a little thankful that they're selective in the scriptures that they choose to try to enforce on the non-believers. Imagine how many more of us would suffer terribly at their hands if they took everything at print value. "Suffer not a witch to live." So many sins are capital offenses in that book. So many things are "abomination"s. I think one of the biggest problems with that book is that it is so long. It's filled with contradictions. The whole idea of Original Sin is contradicted later in the book when it says that children shouldn't suffer for the sins and crimes of the parents. I'll look into getting a copy Starhawk's book. I've been extremely disturbed by the entire idea of people living their lives according to the Bible since I ran across EvilBible.com's website. It's the reference that I wish Matt and I'd had in 10th grade when we debated against the existence of God. (We actually got a 50/50 split and lost only due to the teacher's tie-breaking vote, which was about 50% better than we expected). I like the Christians who live according to the Golden Rule as their primary belief inguiding their actions. "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." If you compare it to "An it harm none, do what ye may," it seems pretty clear that this is another religious tenet that they took from the heathens. (I love the word heathen, because of the etymology.)
( 4 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

October 2019
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lilia Ahner